Quite a few models rely on VIA processors and their Chrome IGP's which might be less suitable in terms of compatibility for certain emulation tasks. You need to look carefully which models are out there. If you are going to install locally, you will need more space. They do come with little storage space of their own through a DOM (basically a small SSD). Your current rig now includes a Radeon HD 5450 - Starting from HP T520 and T610, you get Radeon HD 6320 and higher which are slightly less in performance to the HD 5450 (As they are integrated) but they consume even less. Some even have PCIE connectors to hold a seperate GPU (Look at the Plus versions of HP clients for those most of the time. Most of them have a SATA connection, so you can hoist a HDD in them. Most of the time you can install a full fat Windows on them provided they have a BIOS (Pretty much all HP/Dell's have these.) 20 watts max power consumption is to be expected. They are low powered machines as compared to your current desktop rig. They are omnipresent, especially the HP ones. Sometimes you can get them for free aswell when companies discard them, as most think its a useless machine - Its not. Honestly, If you want to pay for them, you can easily settle for 10-30 bucks and you get a fully functional system with 2 GB RAM easily. Only time will tell.Would go the thin client route (The linked site has a ton of info on them) But is it worth anyone's time? Perhaps probably not. That being said, it will work, even more on the pro. It should be compared to another GPU that is older (and less capable) than my GT1030 or GTX 750 but better than integrated 3000. The bottom line is these specs are bull The CPU makes sense since its from the same era but the GPU is not nearly as good as claimed. I also have the same 8 GB of ram and 2GB on GPU. On the PS3 emulator this time, there is no god of war but the many games that run do beautifully and all ps2 games are good now of course.Īlso i think the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU even If I would get just a more recent computer with the same GPU it would be better. It can handle any emulators, even switch and wii u working nicely at 2x on some games. It can handle any modern games like horizon zero dawn(PC version) much smoother and fluid on the same screen at the same resolution. My feeling is the CPU-GPU combo is much better than the PS4.the graphics are much smoother. It will run PSCX2 many games but no God of war. No wii mario galaxy but some easier to run wii games like NSMB. I can get COD4 started but not good enough to play but it can do some ps2 emulation in the lower to mid end it can do all gamecube and older systems. The CPU with integrated graphics (3000) cannot handle basically any modern games. I have only acquired a graphics card a year and a half ago and it's a GT 1030 which has much slower specs than the GTX750 mentioned. I am much into emulation and I have tried the limits of this system over time. This is a very interesting topic to me because I have been running on a i5 - 3750 which happens to be 1 % slower than the 4670 for about 4 years now. I take it there's no PS2 emulator in Retroarch? But if we can have all sorts of emulators on switch I'm sure PS4 isn't out of the question. Again I'm not clued up on how porting works, or how emulation works for that matter. It's just a case of having someone with the knowhow to create/ port one if it is possible. So I don't think there'd be an issue with emulation specs, but I'm not clued up enough to actually say that for sure. It also has the equivalent of an RX470/RX480 graphics card, which is similar performance to a GTX1060.Īs for RAM, I've just found out the PS4 doesn't have dedicated VRAM? So, I'm not sure how that problem would be worked around, but it has 8GB of RAM which the system uses for graphics, so if it could be tapped into for that then you're all good. I've read that the PS4 has the equivalent of arouuuund an I5-4670 in terms of processing power which would be more than enough. PassMark G3D Mark rating around 3000 (GeForce GTX 750) Two physical cores, with hyperthreading PassMark Single Thread Performance rating near or greater than 1600 Ubuntu 18.04/Debian or newer, Arch Linux, or other distro (32 or 64 bit) I'm not sure what the issues with PS2-FPK are, but I'm sure it's probably something to do with how the games are being interpreted My guess is that it's a lot like turning a PS1 game into an Eboot like back in the PSP days. I'm aware that emulation takes many times more processing power than the original console required, but here I wouldn't have though this was a problem based on those min specs. I honestly think that given the minimum requirements of the PCSX2 emulator that it's not impossible for the PS4 to run PS2 games through an emulator.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |